According to a test performed by Hardware Magazine No. The answer is clear in Opt for Quad Core, preferably with Hyper Threading, whatever your applications! It all depends on how many pieces each task can be split up into.
In such a case, having the 8-core CPU I mentioned earlier would give you an advantage. If you use multi-threaded applications which require lots of multitasking, place a priority on the number of cores in your CPU.
Should you desire something more straightforward like gaming, you may not need a whole lot of cores, but would want to have as much clock speed as possible.
Business Simulation in Server CPU Models In today business' calculation, then we'll, all meaninglessly seem, would consider and talk about money, right? How it would benefit us more and more. That is relevant and acceptable, indeed. Why would such 'multi cores' cost us a lot? Yes, because parallel process is very expensive not just only in its technology. Price would never lie. So, we have to carry on with the economical Xeon E3 right? Absolutely Bold Yes for the economical.
But mind just hang on a second, will you. While you are in VPS' business model or related. Another niche thing about this E3 series: Let say we would like to stack them up to double or triple or even octuple our profit. Okey, let just sort them out. So clock speed of E3 doesn't benefit us anymore? Well, how about if I'd say that we can create a similar robust 8 cores CPU with E5 series in collateral to the clock? Just think of it like this: with E3, 4 cores x 3,5 GHz, you would gain a total of 14 GHz while with E5 series that could rock up the cores, we could easily switch the clock speed to somewhat, 8 cores x 2,2 GHz, so the total would be 17,6 GHz Although as described earlier that this schema would not be easily and systematically performed and implemented as it is on the paper, as such application would not eat up the processor with GHz just like the way we calculate it.
The nasty silly other question would be, how we could benefit from today's E3 series processor? E3 series would much be more suitable for startup with little or small capex capital expenditure , before they can grown up and buy the "beast". There are niche markets for this kind of "non-server" processor environment, I believe At last, what do you think?
What I'm thinking: in today's server business models, we do not count clock speed any longer, because what we count is profit , right? Was this answer helpful? Yes No. Related Articles Forgetting and Forgiving, the conditions to be great One time ago when I attended a seminar event, the speaker is a couple which living in Aceh. Learning from Others A few ten years ago, every time I had a discussion with a friend which is not in accordance with Think a Bigger Goal Once upon a time ago, my friend as a manager in one of IT companies, tells me some story, at Sometimes this isn't even noticable because the cycles are to short to show up in task manager and things like using older plug-ins that have not been compiled using the respective intel-libraries for these newer processors may never even trigger it due to how they behave.
Only experimentation can tell you that, but don't expect miracles even if it works. A fast-running AE could choke the rest of the system, too, you know. Damn, how annoying that it's all about clockspeed. It would rather have a more powerful system that I can use for others things too, such as 3D, real time, gaming etc, than getting something slower.
Hard to believe that its a disadvantage to have a slower CPU The slower cpu in Razer laptops have a higher clock speed. I'm wondering if my old mac from with clock speed of 2. If you want a fairly good system for AE, you should consider a desktop PC instead of laptop.
Clock speeds of 2. If you plan to work with AE, you shouldn't get below 4Ghz base clock. You won't find such CPUs in the laptop market.
In each family, the CPU with the highest clock speed is at most preferable. Adobe is working on better multicore and GPU support - as they do it already for years. So, better don't expect any changes soon. Welcome to the Community! Skip Take tour. Adobe Support Community. Turn on suggestions. Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for. Show only Search instead for. Did you mean:. Processors work according to a clock that beats a set number of times per second, usually measured in gigahertz. For instance, a 3.
Each clock beat represents an opportunity for the processor to manipulate a number of bits equivalent to its capacity -- bit processors can work on 64 bits at a time, while bit processors work on 32 bits at a time. The clock that usually gets included in marketing materials is the internal clock, but a processor also has an external clock that determines how quickly the processor can communicate with the outside world. The internal clock represents how quickly the processor can manipulate the data it already has, while the external clock specifies how quickly it can read the information it needs to manipulate or how quickly it can output the manipulated data.
As of the date of publication, external clocks are frequently significantly slower than internal clocks. For example, while a processor may run at 3 GHz, its external clock could be anywhere from a few hundred MHz to 1 GHz. Since the external clock determines how quickly the processor can communicate with the system's memory, it has a significant effect on your processor's real-world speed. The difference between a processor's internal and external clock speeds is one limitation on its performance.
Another is the number of clock ticks it takes to execute an instruction.
0コメント